03 March 2007

The reluctant feminist

So what's feminism all about? God knows! There are various types but I can't see feminism being prominent, in fact I believe there's been a backlash which has not brought about a new direction, only negative reactions, especially from women wanting to be 'women', which for them equates to making babies and baking. Am I being dismissive? I hope so!
I don't generally call myself a feminist and when I do I feel no pride, no self-confidence, rather a melancholic and powerless feeling. I call myself a feminist when I hear people talking about the essential differences between men and women, the ‘natural’, biological or genetic characteristics of male and female. Most of these differences are in their heads and that’s the problem. Joe’s post on women’s social fear of men is quite insightful. If I were a man I wouldn’t want to be feared, if I were a man I would like to be with a human being, equal to me, not a ‘woman’ identified with a set of ‘natural’ characteristics. I often hear men saying that they cannot understand how some men can ‘hate’ women and that they ‘love’ women. That’s the perfect example of misogyny. It starts by categorising a gender and objectifying it. You stop being a human being and become a woman, whose essence has been shaped and decided by a male society (and a male society’s interpretation of genes). The problem is that misogyny has been around for a very long time and we have internalised it. It is not just hatred and often it’s expressed in its ‘benign’ form such as stereotypes that, however, ‘disable’ women. Men are still the ‘I’, the ‘Self’ and women the ‘Other’, the ‘Second Sex’.
Women’s bodies still belong to society: from what they should wear, how they should look, how they should give birth (regardless of the woman’s choice or safety), how many months they should breastfeed etc. We live in a society that has a seriously unhealthy relationship with the body, where being ‘fat’ (or not skinny) is the ultimate sin. And the body is still primarily that of women.
Nevertheless, feminism for me is partnership. It’s about recognising men and women as human beings and going beyond societal structures and ideology. It’s about going beyond our fears and desires, it’s about belonging to the same oneness.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Surely the argument of Feminism is the freedom of choice? Is it not the right of any woman (or for that matter - any man) to stay at home and bake and raise a family? Is this not Conservative Feminism? (one of the 15 or so varieties of Feminism if I remember my sociology correctly). Does this mean that any mother has let down the cause of Feminism? I hate to to point this out to you, but men can't have babies - not a lot we can do about that - so if women don't, surely this will cause the birth rate to plunge further to dangerously low levels.

I do agree with you that society does have an issue with fat and thin. But there are undertones of a back lash against the super skinny. There is also the argument that obesity is simply unhealthy and costs the NHS millions each year, yet there are procedures in place to take children and teenagers in to care if there BMI falls below a certain level (towards anorexia) but there is no legislation to take them into care if there BMI rises above the level of clinical obesity - yet this still poses significant health risks.

As to breast feeding and birth - surely this is medical advice?

F said...

1. I never suggested women should not have children. Women (or men) can stay at home but it's likely that they will be dependent on their partner. Lack of financial independence and responsibility puts you in a very weak position. If I were the partner I would be pretty annoyed. Why should I work full time to provide for my family and have no time to spend with my children? For most people one salary is not enough. The point is that this idea of womanhood belonging to the private realm of the home has imprisoned women for long enough, giving them a role and no freedom. Women have entered the labour market and are in the public arena. Time to wake up and smell the coffee.

2. There a health risks with obesity (as with taking drugs by the way), but obesity is now seen as a sin. The fact that we are obese, skinny and consume an ever higher volume of pornography means our materialistic society has a bad relationship with the body.

3. medical advice? Don't make me laugh! The point is that whenever women's bodies are concerned, ideology kicks in. This doesn't mean doctors are ideologically prescripive. The ideology primarily comes from other sources who push for 'natural births' and stupidly prolonged breastfeeding and so on. Again, it's part of a flawed conception of womanhood that cares about women's role rather than their health. May I recommend Edward Shorter's History of Women's Bodies?

Add to Technorati Favorites